Home Latest News Business
Category:

Business

KPA CEO Captain William K Ruto. PHOTO/KPA
Business

KPA Boss Captain Ruto Under Fire Over Secret Mombasa Port Deal Worth Millions

by Daily Trends
written by Daily Trends

Kenya Ports Authority (KPA) Managing Director Captain William K. Ruto is facing mounting pressure over allegations surrounding the allocation of prime public land at the Port of Mombasa and the award of an exclusive cargo handling contract linked to South Sudan-bound freight.

The claims, contained in a demand letter by the Genesis for Human Rights Commission (GHRC) and supported by documents reportedly submitted to Parliament’s Transport and Infrastructure Committee, accuse KPA of allocating public land at Kipevu to a private company without competitive procurement, public participation or key statutory approvals.

Captain Ruto, who has served as KPA Managing Director since March 2023, has not publicly responded to the allegations.

Rights group issues seven-day ultimatum

According to the GHRC, its Programme Director Caleb Ng’wena wrote to Captain Ruto on June 9, 2026, demanding documents relating to the disputed transaction.

The rights lobby sought certified copies of the lease or allocation agreement for the Kipevu land, records of public participation, the ownership structure and beneficial ownership details of the private company involved, as well as procurement records relating to an exclusive contract to handle 20 per cent of South Sudan-bound cargo passing through the Port of Mombasa.

The organisation says the seven-day ultimatum expired without a response from KPA.

In its letter, GHRC alleged the transaction raises serious governance concerns.

“This entire transaction reeks of high-level influence-peddling, state capture and brazen land grab orchestrated purely due to the CFS owner’s proximity to power,” Ng’wena stated.

The organisation has threatened legal action seeking court orders to halt construction at the site, nullify the alleged tender award and hold Captain Ruto personally liable in his capacity as KPA’s accounting officer.

Multi-million cargo corridor at the centre of dispute

At the heart of the controversy is the construction of a private Container Freight Station (CFS) on KPA land in Kipevu, Mombasa.

According to the allegations, the company behind the project was also awarded an exclusive, single-sourced contract to handle 20 per cent of cargo destined for South Sudan, one of the busiest transit corridors through the Port of Mombasa.

The GHRC claims neither the lease agreement nor procurement documents have been made public and says the identity and beneficial ownership of the company remain undisclosed.

South Sudan remains one of the largest users of the Port of Mombasa, accounting for 12.7 per cent of transit cargo in 2025, according to KPA statistics cited in the complaint. Overall cargo throughput at the port reached a record 45.45 million tonnes last year.

The rights group argues that controlling a fifth of South Sudan-bound cargo represents a highly lucrative commercial opportunity worth hundreds of millions of shillings annually.

Questions over approvals

The petition also alleges construction at the Kipevu site is proceeding without mandatory approvals required under Kenyan law.

According to GHRC, the site lacks the statutory project information board required under the National Construction Authority Act and may not have approvals from the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA), the National Construction Authority (NCA) or the Mombasa County Government.

The organisation further argues that no evidence has been produced to show public participation was undertaken before the public land was allocated.

If established, such omissions could raise questions over compliance with the Constitution, environmental laws and the Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act.

Long-running battle over South Sudan cargo

The South Sudan cargo corridor has previously been the subject of prolonged legal disputes.

In 2023, companies including Autoport Nairobi Freight Terminal and Compact Freight System Limited moved to court over KPA’s handling of South Sudan cargo, accusing the authority of disregarding court orders governing the movement of transit cargo.

The dispute prompted intervention by the Ministry of Transport, which clarified that importers were free to use any Kenya Revenue Authority-approved bonded facility instead of restricting cargo to specific operators.

The latest allegations suggest a new exclusive arrangement has once again placed the lucrative corridor at the centre of controversy.

Wider scrutiny of KPA procurement

The latest claims add to a series of procurement-related questions that have surrounded KPA in recent years.

Captain Ruto has previously appeared before parliamentary committees to respond to audit queries concerning KPA’s financial management, while separate court proceedings have challenged procurement decisions involving major infrastructure projects undertaken by the authority.

Among the matters cited by critics is a High Court petition challenging the award of a multi-billion-shilling contract under the Mombasa Special Economic Zone Development Project, as well as public criticism from some leaders over the cost of road works within the port.

Those matters remain separate from the current allegations regarding the Kipevu land allocation and South Sudan cargo contract.

Calls for investigations

The GHRC is now urging several state agencies, including the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC), the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) and the Public Procurement Regulatory Authority (PPRA), to investigate the transaction.

The organisation also wants Parliament to compel the release of all procurement records, lease documents and beneficial ownership disclosures relating to the project.

It argues that because KPA land is public property held in trust for Kenyans, any allocation for private commercial use must comply fully with procurement laws, environmental regulations and constitutional requirements.

As pressure mounts, attention is now turning to whether KPA will respond publicly to the allegations or release documents sought by the rights group, even as construction reportedly continues at the disputed Kipevu site.

KPA had not publicly responded to the allegations by the time of publication. The claims remain allegations that have not been tested or determined by a court of law.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedinTumblrWhatsappTelegramEmail
Kalonzo Musyoka on Safaricom sale case
Business

Kalonzo Vows All-Out Legal War to Stop Safaricom Stake Sale to Vodacom

by Daily Trends
written by Daily Trends

Wiper Patriotic Front leader Kalonzo Musyoka has vowed to continue fighting the government’s proposed sale of a 15 per cent stake in Safaricom PLC to South Africa’s Vodacom, insisting the transaction threatens Kenya’s control over one of its most strategic national assets.

His remarks come days after the Court of Appeal lifted conservatory orders that had temporarily halted the multi-billion-shilling transaction, allowing the government to proceed with plans to dispose of part of its shareholding in the telecommunications giant while the substantive constitutional case remains pending.

Taking to his official X account on Monday, June 29, 2026, Kalonzo maintained that the appellate court’s decision should not be interpreted as approval of the sale.

“The Court of Appeal has now lifted the conservatory order. But the lifting of that order is not a green light. It is not judicial endorsement of the transaction. The legal battle continues, and the substantive questions of law and public interest remain squarely before the courts,” Kalonzo said.

The former Vice President argued that reducing Kenya’s shareholding in Safaricom from 35 per cent to 20 per cent would leave the state as a minority shareholder in what he described as the country’s “crown jewel” and a telecommunications asset of immense strategic, economic and national security importance.

“The proposed sale of Kenya’s 15% stake in Safaricom PLC to Vodacom would reduce the Republic to a minority shareholder in its own crown jewel, a national telecommunications asset of strategic, economic, and security significance. This we cannot and will not accept,” Kalonzo said.

He further warned potential investors against rushing to conclude the transaction before the constitutional issues raised in court are determined.

“To those who would rush to conclude this sale before those questions are answered, we say plainly: caveat emptor. Let the buyer beware.”

Kalonzo added that any deal completed before the courts pronounce themselves on the matter would remain vulnerable to legal challenge.

“Any transaction concluded in the shadow of live litigation, against the expressed opposition of the Kenyan people, and without transparent parliamentary sanction, is a transaction concluded at risk. We will pursue every lawful avenue in the courts, in Parliament, and before the people to ensure that Kenya does not surrender control of Safaricom on the altar of opaque dealmaking,” he stated.

Court lifts freeze but case continues

The Court of Appeal last week granted the government’s application to suspend High Court conservatory orders that had blocked implementation of the proposed sale pending the hearing of constitutional petitions challenging the transaction. A three-judge bench held that the government had met the legal threshold for stay orders and that public interest favoured allowing the transaction to proceed.

The appellate judges, however, emphasized that they were not determining the legality or constitutionality of the proposed sale. They also observed that if the petitioners eventually succeed, the transaction could still be reversed because the shares would remain capable of being restored to the relevant parties with appropriate remedies.

Constitutional questions remain

The dispute stems from the government’s plan to sell a 15 per cent stake in Safaricom to Vodacom Group in a transaction valued at about KSh204.3 billion. Parliament approved the partial divestiture earlier this year as part of a broader plan to raise funds for the National Infrastructure Fund and other development priorities.

However, the proposal has attracted multiple legal challenges from opposition leaders and private citizens, including Tony Gachoka, Fredrick Ogola and Kalonzo Musyoka. The petitioners argue that the transaction raises constitutional concerns relating to public participation, transparency, valuation of the shares, data sovereignty and national security. They also contend that the proposed sale price undervalues the government’s stake in Kenya’s largest listed company.

The High Court had earlier agreed that the petitions raised substantial constitutional issues warranting a full hearing and temporarily suspended the sale. While that suspension has now been lifted, the constitutional petitions themselves remain active before the courts, meaning the legality of the proposed transaction has yet to be finally determined.

If completed, the transaction would reduce the National Treasury’s shareholding in Safaricom from 35 per cent to 20 per cent while increasing Vodacom’s ownership, giving the South African telecommunications group majority control of the company.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedinTumblrWhatsappTelegramEmail
Fly748 and Mama Ibado Charity partnership
Business

Fly748 Pumps Ksh3M Into Run 4 Seniors, Rolls Out 10% Flight Discount for Participants

by Daily Trends
written by Daily Trends

Kenyan airline Fly748.com has committed KSh3 million towards the second edition of the Run 4 Seniors charity event, reaffirming its commitment to supporting vulnerable elderly people across the country.

The airline announced its Diamond Sponsorship on Monday ahead of the annual fundraising event organised by Mama Ibado Charity (MIC), which is scheduled to take place on July 18, 2026, at Karura Forest in Nairobi.

The sponsorship will support the planning and delivery of the annual run, which brings together individuals, corporates, running clubs and well-wishers to raise funds and awareness for vulnerable senior citizens in underserved communities across Kakamega and Isiolo counties.

Speaking during the announcement, Fly748.com Head of Scheduled Services George Oduor said the airline was proud to support an initiative that champions the welfare and dignity of older persons.

“At fly748.com, we believe strong communities are built on compassion, inclusion and shared responsibility. Our senior citizens have played an important role in shaping our society and deserve to age with dignity, care and support. We are honoured to partner with Mama Ibado Charity in this noble cause and invite Kenyans from all walks of life to join Run 4 Seniors and make every step count,” said Mr. Oduor.

Run 4 Seniors has grown into one of the country’s flagship charity platforms dedicated to highlighting the challenges facing older persons while mobilising resources for sustainable interventions aimed at improving their quality of life.

Mama Ibado Charity Director Ambassador Dr. Amina Mohamed welcomed the sponsorship, describing it as a significant boost to the organisation’s ongoing efforts to strengthen support for vulnerable senior citizens.

“We are grateful to fly748.com for walking this journey with us. This partnership reflects the growing recognition that older persons in our communities need consistent care, dignity and protection. The support will help us expand the reach and impact of Run 4 Seniors, and continue delivering programmes that respond to the realities of seniors facing poverty, neglect and social isolation,” said Amb. Dr. Mohamed.

Funds raised during the event will support Mama Ibado Charity’s Seniors Feeding and Healthcare Programmes, which provide monthly food assistance, access to essential healthcare services, medication support and community-based care for elderly people living in vulnerable conditions.

Beyond the financial contribution, Fly748.com will also use its communication platforms to encourage greater public participation in the charity run while creating awareness about the challenges facing Kenya’s ageing population.

As part of the partnership, the airline is offering a 10 per cent discount on flight tickets to participants who register for Run 4 Seniors.

Fly748.com joins a growing list of corporate sponsors backing the initiative, including KCB and Sidian Bank, reflecting increasing private sector support for programmes aimed at restoring dignity and improving the wellbeing of senior citizens across Kenya.

Mama Ibado Charity is a registered charitable organisation that works to improve the lives of vulnerable senior citizens through feeding, healthcare, housing and community support programmes in underserved communities.

Fly748.com, operated by Seven Four Eight Air Services (K) Ltd., offers scheduled domestic passenger services to Mombasa and Ukunda, with a focus on safety, reliability, and customer experience.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedinTumblrWhatsappTelegramEmail
Mohamed Ali alias Moha Jicho Pevu
Business

Port of Scandal? KPA Chases KSh43.5 Million from Firm Tied to Moha Jicho Pevu’s Right-Hand Man

by Daily Trends
written by Daily Trends

Nyali MP Mohamed Ali’s inner circle dragged into controversy as Kenya Ports Authority pursues millions in alleged rent and cargo arrears

Nyali MP and Mombasa gubernatorial hopeful Mohamed Ali, popularly known as Moha Jicho Pevu, has been thrust into an unfolding controversy after documents linked to a company associated with his close allies revealed a KSh43.59 million debt demand from the Kenya Ports Authority (KPA).

At the center of the dispute is Somtrade Limited, a company whose shareholding and directorship records reportedly feature individuals closely linked to the outspoken legislator’s political camp.

While Mohamed Ali is not listed as a shareholder in the company, the emergence of his close confidant and personal assistant, Naeem Shafiq Mohamed, as a key shareholder has intensified scrutiny and raised questions about the company’s relationship with the MP’s inner circle.

KPA Demands KSh43.59 Million

According to documents circulating in Mombasa political and business circles, KPA issued a demand notice dated June 10, 2026, seeking KSh43,590,157.47 from Somtrade Limited over outstanding rental and cargo-related charges.

The debt is reportedly broken down as follows:

  • Rental Lease Account No. 411200 – KSh25,142,410.00
  • Cargo Account No. 103011 – KSh18,447,747.47

The total claim stands at KSh43.59 million.

The authority is said to have demanded payment within seven days, warning of possible legal action if the amount remained unpaid.

The dispute reportedly stems from a lease agreement entered into between Somtrade Limited and KPA on November 21, 2023, involving Shade 2 on Title Number Mombasa/Block/1/492.

Moha’s Close Ally at the Heart of the Storm

The controversy has gained political significance because of the individuals associated with the company.

Records cited in the documents reportedly show that Naeem Shafiq Mohamed, widely known in Mombasa political circles as Mohamed Ali’s trusted aide and close political confidant, is the largest shareholder in Somtrade Limited with 30 shares.

Other shareholders listed include:

  • Ibrahim Bagajo Karayu – 25 shares
  • Mohamed Ibrahim Abdi – 25 shares
  • Suleiman Ibrahim Surrow – 20 shares

Naeem’s proximity to the Nyali MP has made it difficult for political observers to separate the controversy from Mohamed Ali’s broader political brand, particularly given the legislator’s long-standing anti-corruption and accountability stance.

Naeem Shafiq Mohamed shakes hands with President William Ruto

Payment Plan Rejected

Documents referenced in the dispute indicate that Somtrade Limited allegedly sought approval from KPA for a structured payment plan to settle the outstanding arrears.

However, KPA reportedly declined the request, maintaining that the authority operates on a cash-based model and does not extend credit facilities for its services.

The authority is also said to have argued that the outstanding debt had accumulated over an extended period and was inconsistent with established operational policies.

Naeem Shafiq Mohamed shakes hands with former deputy president Rigathi Gachagua as Mohamed Ali alias Moha Jicho Pevu looks on

The reported rejection of the payment proposal has added a new dimension to the controversy, suggesting that the dispute has escalated beyond routine commercial disagreements.

Former Mombasa Trade CEC Also Linked

Further attention has been drawn to the involvement of Mohamed Ibrahim Abdi, a former Mombasa County Executive Committee Member for Trade during former Governor Hassan Joho’s administration.

Abdi is reportedly listed among the company’s directors and shareholders, creating a mix of political and business interests that has fueled speculation within Mombasa’s political landscape.

Observers note that the presence of both a senior political aide and a former county executive in the same company raises legitimate public interest questions regarding influence, access, and accountability.

Tough Questions for Moha Jicho Pevu

The controversy comes at a sensitive political moment for Mohamed Ali, who has built much of his public profile around exposing corruption, demanding accountability, and challenging powerful interests.

Critics now argue that the revelations place the spotlight closer to home.

Although there is no evidence that Mohamed Ali holds shares in Somtrade Limited or was directly involved in its operations, questions are emerging over whether he was aware of the company’s dealings with KPA and the growing debt allegedly owed to the authority.

Political analysts say the issue is less about direct ownership and more about perception, particularly when individuals considered part of a politician’s inner circle become entangled in major financial disputes involving public institutions.

How Did the Debt Grow?

One of the most significant questions emerging from the saga concerns how a debt of more than KSh43 million accumulated under an authority that reportedly operates on a cash-payment basis.

Critics have questioned whether there were delays in enforcement, whether warning signs were ignored, or whether the company was allowed to continue operating despite mounting arrears.

The answers to those questions may prove crucial in determining whether the matter remains a commercial dispute or evolves into a broader examination of governance and oversight within the port sector.

Political Fallout Looms

For Mohamed Ali, the issue threatens to become more than a financial dispute involving associates.

As a public figure who has consistently positioned himself as a champion of transparency and accountability, any controversy touching individuals within his closest political circle is likely to attract heightened scrutiny.

With Mombasa’s political temperatures already rising ahead of future electoral contests, the KSh43.59 million KPA demand has the potential to become a major talking point in the county’s political discourse.

Whether the matter is resolved through payment, legal action, or public clarification, one thing is certain: the controversy has placed Moha Jicho Pevu’s camp under an uncomfortable spotlight.

And until the questions surrounding Somtrade Limited, Naeem Shafiq Mohamed, and the KPA debt are fully answered, the political storm is unlikely to fade away.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedinTumblrWhatsappTelegramEmail
Migori County Chief Finance Officer John Achuora and Mercy Wamoto of Elgon Group
Business

Who Owes the Money? Migori County and Elgon Group Drawn Into Ksh3.8M Piny Luo Festival Row

by Romelu Lukaku
written by Romelu Lukaku

A payment dispute linked to the 2025 Piny Luo Festival is now threatening to escalate into a wider legal and public accountability battle after a Nairobi-based branding firm accused Migori County of failing to settle KSh3,814,380.76 for services rendered during the event.

At the centre of the dispute is BrandPulse Experience, trading as Lokhart SIPE Ltd, which says it carried out branding services for the high-profile cultural festival but has been left chasing payment for months despite repeated follow-ups, formal correspondence and direct engagement with parties linked to the event.

The dispute places Migori County Chief Officer for Finance Dr John Achuora and Elgon Group CEO Mercy Wamoto under fresh scrutiny as questions mount over who was responsible for settling the branding bill and why the contractor says the agreed settlement amount remains unpaid long after the event was completed.

Elgon Group Events officials
Elgon Group Events officials

For what began as a supplier payment issue, the matter now carries wider implications for county procurement accountability, event contracting and the treatment of private suppliers engaged in public-facing county projects.

THE KSH3.8 MILLION CLAIM

The core of the dispute is now clearly set out in a final demand notice dated April 1, 2026. In that letter, BrandPulse states that it is demanding settlement of an outstanding amount arising from branding and experiential services rendered during the Piny Luo Festival 2025.

The company says that after prior engagements, it agreed in good faith to a discounted settlement amount of KSh3,814,380.76 from the original invoice sum of KSh4,717,447.08. According to the letter, that reduced figure still remained unpaid and had become “unacceptably overdue” since December 2025.

The final demand notice was addressed directly to Dr John Achuora, the Chief Officer for Finance, County Government of Migori, and warned that unless the amount was settled within seven days, the company would move to pursue legal and administrative remedies to recover the debt, together with associated costs and interest. The letter copied the Governor of Migori County, the County Secretary, the CECM for Finance, and Elgon Group Ltd.

That document is important because it changes the focus of the dispute. The current live claim is not the original KSh4.7 million invoice but the KSh3,814,380.76 discounted settlement amount that the contractor says Migori County still failed to pay even after a concession had already been made.

A COUNTY PAYMENT DISPUTE THAT REFUSES TO GO AWAY

The branding firm’s position is that it delivered services linked to the Piny Luo Festival but has spent months chasing money that should have been settled long ago. Earlier correspondence had already shown that the company was pressing for payment over branding work carried out at festival-linked venues and installations in Migori County. The April 1 final demand notice now gives the clearest indication yet of how far the dispute has deteriorated.

A contractor who had already reduced its claim by almost KSh1 million was still left writing a final demand to the county finance office, threatening legal recovery action and copying top county officials together with Elgon Group. That is not a routine payment delay. It is a sign of a dispute that had moved from internal follow-up to formal debt recovery pressure.

The existence of a discounted settlement amount also weakens any suggestion that the contractor was being unreasonable or inflexible. On the contrary, the letter suggests the company had already made a concession in the hope of resolving the matter amicably. Yet even after that reduction, the money still did not come.

That is the detail that now puts Migori County in an even more difficult position. If a supplier reduced its demand from KSh4,717,447.08 to KSh3,814,380.76 and still went unpaid, then the county must explain why the matter was allowed to drift into a final demand notice instead of being resolved administratively.

ACHUORA NOW CARRIES THE HEAVIEST QUESTIONS

The person who cannot escape the spotlight in this dispute is Dr John Achuora. The final demand notice was not addressed to a junior procurement officer or an event coordinator. It was addressed directly to the Chief Officer for Finance, the official expected to know the status of county payments and the movement of any funds linked to county obligations.

That matters because the county finance office is where the payment trail should either become clear or collapse entirely. If Migori County approved the branding bill, Achuora’s office should be able to say what amount was approved, whether payment was processed and to whom the money was released. If no payment was made, then the county should explain why a supplier was left waiting from December 2025 into April 2026 despite formal follow-ups and an agreed discounted settlement.

At the moment, the dispute appears to be caught in a fog of competing explanations. Information circulating around the matter suggests there are conflicting positions between county officials and parties linked to the event over whether money meant for the contractor was released and who was supposed to settle the claim. That is precisely why the finance office now carries the greatest burden of explanation.

A chief finance officer cannot sit at the centre of a multimillion-shilling county payment dispute and offer the public nothing but silence. If money was paid, he should show the payment trail. If money was not paid, he should explain what blocked the process. If another party was expected to handle settlement, he should explain the legal and administrative basis of that arrangement. What cannot continue is a situation where the supplier says it is unpaid, a final demand has already been issued, and the county still appears unable or unwilling to provide a clean answer.

THE ELGON GROUP QUESTION

The dispute also places Elgon Group and its CEO Mercy Wamoto under scrutiny, though the legal and financial weight of the claim still falls most heavily on Migori County because the final demand was directed to the county finance office.

Elgon Group appears in the paper trail because it was copied in the final demand notice, and because its name has repeatedly surfaced in conversations around the festival’s payment structure. That raises a legitimate question: what role, if any, did Elgon Group play in the management, coordination or payment chain of the Piny Luo Festival branding work?

If Elgon Group was merely copied for information, it should say so clearly. If it had a deeper role in handling suppliers, managing event implementation or facilitating payments, that too should be made public. The lack of clarity around the payment chain is one of the reasons this dispute has become so messy.

Even so, the final demand notice makes one point unmistakable: the company demanding payment has formally placed responsibility before Migori County’s finance office. That means the county cannot hide behind Elgon Group, and Elgon Group cannot be used as a shield for unanswered questions within county government.

THE LEGAL RISK NOW FACING MIGORI COUNTY

The April 1 letter is not a casual complaint. It is a final demand notice, and that has legal significance. It signals that the contractor considers the matter ripe for recovery action and has given the county formal notice before moving to the next stage.

According to the letter, the company attached:

  1. Invoice No. 001251219, and
  2. the letter of engagement for BrandPulse Experience in respect of the Piny Luo Festival 2025.

Those two documents matter because they are the kind of records that would sit at the centre of any recovery claim. If the contractor has a valid engagement letter, an invoice, proof of services rendered and a paper trail showing repeated demand for payment, Migori County could face a difficult time defending a prolonged non-payment position unless it has a clear legal basis for withholding the money.

The county also faces the risk of turning what should have been a simple supplier settlement into a larger public scandal. Once a final demand is copied to the governor, the county secretary, the CECM for finance and a private company linked to the event, the dispute stops being a back-office billing issue. It becomes a question of governance and accountability.

WHY THIS STORY MATTERS BEYOND ONE BILL

This is not just a dispute between one county and one supplier. It speaks to a wider problem in public procurement and county event spending across Kenya.

Private firms are often brought in to brand public events, supply logistics, run communications and deliver visibility for county projects. They are expected to move quickly, absorb upfront costs and deliver polished work because public officials want the event to succeed and the county to look organised. The problem comes after the applause, when suppliers begin chasing payment and discover that nobody wants to take responsibility for the bill.

That is how businesses are cornered. The county gets its event. The officials get their photographs and public praise. The public sees banners, stages, media coverage and cultural celebration. But the supplier who financed the work is left making calls, sending letters and issuing final demands months later.

That is why this case matters. If a contractor had to reduce a KSh4.7 million invoice to KSh3.8 million and still could not get paid, then the issue is no longer just delay. It becomes a warning about how county-linked projects can quietly push suppliers into financial distress long after the public event is over.

THE QUESTIONS MIGORI COUNTY MUST ANSWER

Migori County now owes the public a direct explanation.

Was BrandPulse engaged to provide branding and experiential services for the Piny Luo Festival 2025? If so, was the work delivered and acknowledged? Did the county approve the original invoice of KSh4,717,447.08? If yes, why was the contractor later forced to accept a discounted settlement of KSh3,814,380.76? And if that discounted amount was agreed, why was it still not paid?

Those are not minor questions. They go directly to the heart of public accountability. They also go to the conduct of the county finance office. A chief finance officer should be able to answer them with records, not rumours.

Migori County should also clarify the role of Elgon Group in the payment chain, if any. If the county’s position is that another party was involved in settlement, then that arrangement should be disclosed. If no such arrangement existed, then the county should say so plainly and take full responsibility for the payment status.

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT

Unless the matter has since been resolved, the April 1 final demand suggests the dispute was already on the edge of legal action. That means Migori County may now be facing not only reputational damage but also the prospect of court proceedings over an unpaid county-linked debt.

For the contractor, the issue is simple. It says it did the work, reduced its claim and still remained unpaid.

For Migori County, the issue is harder. It now has to explain why a supplier was pushed to issue a final demand notice over a county festival bill that should have been settled months earlier.

For Dr John Achuora, the issue is even sharper. His office is now the address on the final demand. He is the finance official expected to know whether the county paid, failed to pay or simply allowed the matter to drift until it became a legal threat.

That is why this dispute is no longer a quiet invoice disagreement. It has become a test of whether Migori County can account for money tied to a public event, whether its finance office can explain an unpaid KSh3.8 million settlement claim, and whether private suppliers who work on county projects can expect to be treated as partners rather than as creditors to be ignored after the event is over.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedinTumblrWhatsappTelegramEmail
Airtel money and KCB partnership
Business

Financial Inclusion or Data Capture? Inside the KCB Bank–Airtel Money Alliance Rewiring Kenya’s Money Rails

by Romelu Lukaku
written by Romelu Lukaku

When two of Kenya’s most powerful financial institutions sit side by side, pens poised over a partnership agreement and smiling for the cameras, the language is predictable: inclusion, innovation, interoperability, ecosystem.

That was the public face of the new alliance between KCB Bank Kenya and Airtel Money Kenya—a deal granting Airtel Money access to over 22,000 KCB banking agents nationwide for deposits and withdrawals.

But beneath the polished press photos and carefully worded joint statements lies a deeper question this investigation refuses to ignore:

Is Kenya witnessing a breakthrough in financial inclusion—or the quiet consolidation of a private data empire over its money flows?

A market shift happening in real time

The timing of the deal is not accidental.

Over the past two years, Airtel Money has been steadily eroding Safaricom’s dominance in mobile money, growing its market share from roughly 3% to about 11% by late 2025. Its strategy has been simple but disruptive: lower fees, aggressive pricing, and free intra-network transfers.

For the first time in over a decade, M-Pesa’s dominance has shown cracks.

At the same time, the Central Bank of Kenya has repeatedly delayed full agent-level interoperability—a reform meant to ensure that any customer can transact at any agent regardless of network.

That failure has created a vacuum. And into that vacuum, private giants are stepping in.

“When public rails fail, private toll roads emerge”

In theory, Kenya’s payments architecture was supposed to become fully interoperable by 2024 under the National Payments Strategy.

In practice, that promise remains unfulfilled in 2026.

The result is a fragmented system where access is still controlled by networks, contracts, and corporate alliances—not public infrastructure.

The KCB–Airtel partnership effectively builds a parallel interoperability system, but one governed entirely by commercial logic.

As one Nairobi payments analyst put it:

“When the public rail doesn’t arrive, companies build toll roads. And they decide who pays—and who gets seen.”

What Airtel actually gained: instant infrastructure

For Airtel Money Kenya, the deal is transformational.

Instead of slowly building an agent network from scratch, Airtel now plugs into KCB’s massive 22,000-agent ecosystem overnight.

That means:

  • Immediate nationwide cash-in/cash-out coverage
  • Reduced liquidity and float management costs
  • Faster competitive parity with dominant mobile money networks

But critically, the financial terms of the agreement remain undisclosed.

No public breakdown exists of:

  • Revenue sharing per transaction
  • Agent commission structures
  • Float risk allocation
  • Data-sharing arrangements

The silence is not incidental—it is structural.

What KCB actually gained: the invisible asset

For KCB Bank Kenya, the deal is far more strategic than it appears.

This is not just an agency expansion. It is a data acquisition pipeline disguised as interoperability.

KCB has, over the past year:

  • Acquired a controlling stake in Riverbank Solutions (agency banking infrastructure)
  • Invested in Pesapal (merchant payments processor)
  • Now integrated Airtel Money into its agent network

Together, these moves create a financial visibility triangle:

  • Cash movement at agents
  • Merchant spending at tills
  • Mobile wallet flows across Airtel users

In effect, KCB is assembling a near-complete picture of everyday financial life—not through traditional banking relationships, but through infrastructure ownership.

The question is no longer whether KCB is a bank.

It is whether it is becoming a financial data platform.

The agents in the middle: the ignored infrastructure

More than 22,000 agents now sit at the centre of this system.

These small businesses are expected to process:

  • KCB banking transactions
  • Airtel Money deposits and withdrawals
  • Other mobile money flows

Yet one key detail is missing from all public communication:

commission economics.

Without clarity on agent incentives, a deeper risk emerges:

  • Some transaction types may become more profitable than others
  • Agents may prioritise certain networks
  • Customers may experience silent friction depending on which service they use

In other words, interoperability may exist in theory—but not in practice.

The data question regulators already saw coming

The Competition Authority of Kenya previously imposed strict conditions on KCB’s acquisition of Riverbank Solutions, requiring that third-party transactional data be ring-fenced from bank use.

But the Airtel partnership complicates that boundary.

If Airtel Money transactions flow through infrastructure linked to KCB-controlled systems, a critical question emerges:

Where does operational processing end—and commercial data extraction begin?

Under Kenya’s Data Protection Act (2019), personal financial data must be:

  • Collected for explicit purposes
  • Processed transparently
  • Protected from secondary commercial use without consent

Yet customers transacting at agents are rarely told:

  • Which entities can see their data
  • How long it is stored
  • Whether it influences credit scoring or marketing

The architecture may be compliant on paper—but opaque in practice.

A regulatory vacuum turned business model

The Central Bank of Kenya’s long-promised Fast Payment System and full agent interoperability framework remain incomplete.

That absence is not neutral—it is productive.

It creates space for:

  • Bilateral corporate agreements
  • Private interoperability networks
  • Fragmented but profitable ecosystems

What was supposed to be a public utility is increasingly being replaced by negotiated access between private players.

And those negotiations are not public.

The real product is not payments—it is visibility

At surface level, the partnership is about convenience:

  • More access points
  • Faster cash withdrawals
  • Expanded coverage for Airtel users

But beneath that layer lies a more sensitive asset:

predictable, high-volume financial behaviour data.

Every deposit, withdrawal, and transfer becomes a signal:

  • Income flow patterns
  • Spending behaviour
  • Liquidity cycles
  • Creditworthiness indicators

In modern finance, that is more valuable than transaction fees.

The unanswered questions

Despite the scale of the deal, key questions remain publicly unanswered:

  • What are agent commission rates for Airtel transactions compared to KCB or M-Pesa equivalents?
  • Does KCB gain access to Airtel transaction data for credit scoring or marketing?
  • How is compliance with prior data ring-fencing conditions being enforced?
  • Who bears liquidity risk in the agent network?
  • Why are the core financial terms undisclosed?

Until those answers are provided, the partnership remains only partially visible to the public it claims to serve.

Conclusion: inclusion or quiet consolidation?

There is no dispute that the KCB–Airtel alliance improves access for ordinary users. A rural trader, a boda boda operator, or a small shop owner will indeed find it easier to move cash.

But convenience is not the only metric that matters.

The deeper question is whether Kenya is witnessing:

  • A genuine expansion of interoperable financial infrastructure
    or
  • The gradual consolidation of financial visibility into a handful of powerful institutions

The answer will not be found in press releases.

It will be found in the data flows no one has publicly mapped, the contracts no one has published, and the regulatory questions no one has yet fully asked.

For now, the system is working.

The only question is: for whom?

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedinTumblrWhatsappTelegramEmail
Elgon Group Events officials
Business

Elgon Group Events Under Fire: KSh3.4 Million Piny Luo Festival Payment Trail Sparks Fresh Unpaid Supplier Claims

by Romelu Lukaku
written by Romelu Lukaku

Fresh pressure is mounting on Elgon Group Events Management and Consultancy Limited after new questions emerged regarding the handling of funds allocated for the Piny Luo Festival, with suppliers and service providers claiming they remain unpaid despite company documents indicating that all obligations had been settled.

At the center of the controversy is a KSh3.4 million payment received by Elgon Events from the County Government of Migori for services related to the cultural festival, one of the region’s flagship events celebrating Luo heritage and culture.

Documents reviewed by this publication show that Elgon Events formally acknowledged receiving the funds and subsequently informed county officials that consultants and service providers engaged for the event had been paid.

A statement of account accompanying the correspondence reportedly reflected an outstanding balance of zero, suggesting that all financial obligations arising from the festival had been cleared.

However, weeks after the event, multiple suppliers and workers continue to raise concerns over payments they claim have not been received.

The emerging complaints have created a growing contradiction that stakeholders say requires urgent clarification.

If all service providers were compensated as indicated in company records, critics argue, the company should have no difficulty providing documentation confirming the payments. If some claims remain unresolved, they say, a detailed explanation should be provided to account for the discrepancies.

The controversy has quickly evolved from a payment dispute into a broader accountability issue involving public funds.

Because taxpayer money was used to facilitate the festival, questions are now being directed not only at Elgon Events but also at the processes used to verify that contractors, suppliers, and workers received the payments due to them.

Among the questions now being raised are: Who was paid? How much was paid? Which suppliers were compensated? Are there service providers who remain unpaid despite the company’s declarations that obligations were settled?

For many stakeholders, these questions go to the heart of transparency and financial accountability.

The matter has also revived interest in previous complaints involving Elgon Events and some of its officials.

One of the most publicized disputes involved musician and entrepreneur Akothee, who previously accused the company and one of its officials, Mercy Wamoto, of failing to deliver event management services after receiving payment for an assignment.

In a detailed social media post, Akothee alleged that despite paying KSh80,000 for event management services, key responsibilities, including invitation management, guest coordination and event logistics, were either delayed or poorly executed.

She claimed she was ultimately forced to take over much of the work herself to prevent the event from failing.

Those allegations remain claims made by Akothee and have not been determined by any court.

Nevertheless, critics now point to the complaints as part of a broader pattern that they believe warrants closer scrutiny of the company’s operations.

The renewed attention comes as suppliers linked to the Piny Luo Festival continue seeking answers over their alleged unpaid dues.

For Elgon Events, observers say the path toward resolving the controversy is straightforward.

The company can publicly address the claims, engage affected suppliers, and provide verifiable payment records showing how the KSh3.4 million received for the festival was disbursed.

Until such clarification is provided, questions surrounding the Piny Luo Festival payment trail are likely to persist.

As pressure grows and more suppliers come forward, the controversy threatens to overshadow the success of the cultural event itself, leaving Elgon Events facing mounting calls for transparency over how public funds were managed and whether all those who delivered services for the festival were paid in full.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedinTumblrWhatsappTelegramEmail
BAT Kenya
Business

The BAT Kenya Dossier: Tax Scandals, Influence Claims and How Velo Captured a Generation

by Romelu Lukaku
written by Romelu Lukaku

Inside the controversies surrounding BAT Kenya, from tax allegations and lobbying claims to the explosive rise of Velo nicotine pouches among young consumers

For decades, British American Tobacco (BAT) Kenya has occupied a dominant position in the country’s tobacco industry, generating billions of shillings in revenue and contributing significant tax income to the government.

Yet behind its corporate success lies a growing list of controversies that have attracted scrutiny from regulators, public health advocates, civil society groups, and consumers alike.

From allegations of tax discrepancies and claims of regulatory influence to mounting concerns over the rapid spread of its nicotine pouch product, Velo, BAT Kenya finds itself at the center of one of the most consequential public health and corporate accountability debates in the country.

This is the BAT Kenya dossier.

Tax Questions That Refuse to Go Away

One of the most significant controversies facing BAT Kenya emerged in 2025 following an investigative report that alleged discrepancies in the company’s revenue disclosures for the 2017 and 2018 financial years.

The report claimed there was a substantial gap between figures reported in different jurisdictions, raising questions about whether the company may have underpaid taxes amounting to billions of shillings.

The allegations triggered calls from civil society organizations and tax justice advocates for a comprehensive forensic audit of BAT Kenya’s financial records.

The Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) subsequently indicated that it was reviewing the claims.

BAT Kenya strongly rejected the allegations, describing the report as inaccurate and insisting that its financial statements complied with all applicable laws, accounting standards and regulatory requirements.

While no conclusive finding of wrongdoing has been publicly announced, the controversy reignited debate about tax transparency and the accountability of multinational corporations operating in Kenya.

Allegations of Corporate Influence

Another controversy emerged following reports suggesting that BAT had successfully lobbied government authorities regarding the regulation of nicotine pouch products.

Investigative reports alleged that health warning requirements for Velo were modified after discussions involving the company and policymakers.

Public health advocates argued that any weakening of warning labels could potentially undermine consumer awareness of nicotine-related risks.

BAT has maintained that its engagement with regulators is lawful, transparent and consistent with normal industry practice.

The company has repeatedly stated that it operates within established legal frameworks and supports evidence-based regulation.

Nevertheless, the episode fueled broader concerns about the influence large corporations may wield over public policy decisions.

The Rise of Velo

While traditional cigarette consumption has faced increasing restrictions and declining social acceptance, nicotine pouches have emerged as one of the fastest-growing segments of the nicotine market.

At the center of that growth is Velo.

Marketed as a smoke-free nicotine product, Velo is placed under the lip, allowing users to consume nicotine without smoking or vaping.

BAT and other tobacco companies present nicotine pouches as alternative products for adult nicotine consumers.

However, health experts warn that the absence of smoke does not eliminate the addictive nature of nicotine.

The rapid growth of Velo in Kenya has generated increasing concern among parents, educators, and health advocates who fear that nicotine pouch use is expanding among younger consumers.

Social media platforms have played a significant role in popularizing the product, with users sharing experiences, reviews, and recommendations that have helped increase its visibility.

A New Generation and Nicotine Addiction Concerns

Public health advocates argue that nicotine pouches risk creating a new generation of nicotine-dependent consumers.

Medical experts note that nicotine remains a highly addictive substance regardless of the delivery method.

Concerns have intensified as reports emerge of younger users experimenting with nicotine pouches due to perceptions that they are cleaner, safer or less harmful than cigarettes.

Health campaigners have called for stronger regulations, more prominent warning labels, and increased public awareness campaigns aimed at educating consumers about nicotine addiction.

Supporters of nicotine harm-reduction strategies, however, argue that products such as Velo may offer alternatives for adult smokers seeking options other than combustible tobacco.

The debate has become one of the most polarizing issues in Kenya’s public health sector.

Global Troubles Add to Local Scrutiny

BAT Kenya’s challenges are unfolding against a backdrop of broader controversies involving its parent company.

British American Tobacco has faced regulatory investigations, legal disputes, and compliance-related cases in multiple jurisdictions around the world.

These global controversies have increased scrutiny of BAT’s operations across various markets, including Kenya.

For critics, the pattern raises questions about corporate governance and accountability.

For the company, it highlights the challenges of operating in a highly regulated and politically sensitive industry.

The Bigger Question

The BAT Kenya story is about more than one company.

It touches on questions of taxation, public health, corporate influence, consumer protection, and the responsibilities of multinational corporations operating in developing economies.

As regulators examine emerging nicotine products and public health advocates push for tighter controls, the debate surrounding BAT Kenya is unlikely to fade anytime soon.

What remains clear is that Velo’s rapid growth, combined with longstanding questions about corporate accountability, has placed BAT Kenya under an intense spotlight.

Whether that scrutiny leads to tougher regulation, policy reforms, or greater transparency remains to be seen.

But for now, the BAT Kenya dossier continues to grow—one controversy, one investigation and one public health debate at a time.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedinTumblrWhatsappTelegramEmail
KCB Bank
Business

KCB Fraud Scandal Deepens as Nearly 100 Staff Dismissals Spark Questions of Possible Internal Rot

by Daily Trends
written by Daily Trends

Fresh controversy is building around Kenya Commercial Bank (KCB) after internal disclosures revealed that nearly 100 employees have been dismissed over fraud-related misconduct in just two years, triggering uncomfortable questions about whether the lender is facing isolated cases of indiscipline, or something more systemic within its operations.

The bank has confirmed that 60 employees were dismissed in 2025, following 34 more in 2024, bringing the total to 94 staff members removed over fraud-related allegations within 24 months.

While KCB maintains that the dismissals reflect strong enforcement of internal controls, critics are now questioning whether the figures point to deeper governance weaknesses inside one of East Africa’s most influential financial institutions.

“Too many cases to be coincidence,” critics argue

The disclosures have sparked quiet but growing unease within governance and financial circles, with some observers suggesting that the pattern of repeated fraud incidents involving staff may indicate more than isolated misconduct.

KCB recorded 201 fraud incidents in 2025 alone, the vast majority—188—occurring in Kenya, its largest and most critical market.

For critics, the combination of high incident numbers and mass staff dismissals raises a difficult question:

Is the bank detecting fraud—or constantly reacting to a system that keeps failing internally?

Inside the “insider threat” concern

Banking experts have long warned that insider fraud is among the most damaging risks in financial institutions, as employees with system access can bypass safeguards, manipulate transactions, or collaborate with external actors.

In KCB’s case, the fact that a significant proportion of dismissed staff were directly involved in customer-facing or operational roles has intensified scrutiny of internal supervision.

Some analysts argue that the situation points to potential weaknesses in:

  • Employee vetting and background checks
  • Internal audit responsiveness
  • Branch-level oversight
  • Digital access control systems
  • Compliance enforcement culture

However, no evidence has been publicly presented to suggest coordinated institutional wrongdoing.

A bank under pressure to defend its credibility

KCB insists it is actively strengthening its fraud detection systems, citing biometric verification, real-time monitoring tools, and enhanced cybersecurity frameworks.

The bank also reports that it successfully blocked Sh141.1 million in attempted fraud, suggesting that controls are actively intercepting suspicious activity.

But critics argue that prevention, not detection, should be the benchmark for a system of KCB’s scale.

“If employees are still being dismissed in large numbers every year, then something is not being fixed at the root level,” one governance observer said.

Growing concerns over trust and reputation

The controversy is especially sensitive given KCB’s dominant role in Kenya’s financial ecosystem, where it manages billions in deposits and finances major corporate and government-linked transactions.

For customers, the repeated fraud headlines raise anxiety about whether internal systems are strong enough to fully safeguard their funds.

For investors, the issue is increasingly reputational: whether governance risks could eventually translate into financial or regulatory consequences.

Silence and scrutiny

While KCB has defended its controls, it has not publicly detailed the specific nature of the misconduct cases or whether any broader internal investigation is underway beyond disciplinary action.

That silence is now fueling speculation in financial circles about whether the dismissals represent the visible surface of a deeper internal problem.

Governance experts caution, however, that fraud incidents alone do not prove systemic failure—especially in large banks where internal monitoring often uncovers and removes bad actors before major losses occur.

The bigger question hanging over KCB

As scrutiny intensifies, the central issue is no longer just the number of employees dismissed.

It is what the pattern suggests about the institution itself.

Is KCB aggressively cleaning up fraud within a functioning system—or repeatedly battling the same internal weaknesses year after year?

Until that question is clearly answered, analysts say the controversy is unlikely to fade.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedinTumblrWhatsappTelegramEmail
Mary Wambui Mungai
Business

Mary Wambui Under Fresh Fire as Auditor-General Flags Multi-Billion Digital Superhighway Contracts

by Daily Trends
written by Daily Trends

Auditor-General Report Revives Questions Over Digital Superhighway Tenders Linked to Mary Wambui

Businesswoman Mary Wambui Mungai has once again found herself at the centre of public scrutiny after the Auditor-General reportedly flagged concerns over multi-billion-shilling contracts awarded under Kenya’s Digital Superhighway project.

The findings have reignited debate over transparency, accountability and possible conflict-of-interest concerns surrounding some of the lucrative fibre optic infrastructure tenders awarded as part of the government’s ambitious digital transformation agenda.

The Digital Superhighway programme is one of President William Ruto’s flagship projects and seeks to expand broadband internet connectivity across Kenya through the installation of thousands of kilometres of fibre optic cable and the rollout of public Wi-Fi hotspots.

Auditor-General Raises Questions Over Digital Superhighway Contracts

According to the Auditor-General’s observations, concerns have emerged regarding the participation and award of contracts to companies reportedly linked to Mary Wambui during the implementation of the Digital Superhighway programme.

The audit findings have revived questions that have previously been raised by governance activists, consumer rights groups and procurement watchdogs regarding the awarding of government tenders connected to Kenya’s communications and ICT sector.

Critics argue that the issue goes beyond whether procurement laws were technically followed and extends to whether public confidence can be maintained when companies associated with influential public figures secure major government contracts.

Mary Wambui’s Previous Role Draws Fresh Attention

The renewed scrutiny comes partly because of Mary Wambui’s previous role as chairperson of the board of the Communications Authority of Kenya (CA).

Mary Wambui Mungai
Mary Wambui Mungai

Court Cases Already Challenging Digital Superhighway Tenders

The latest Auditor-General report comes against the backdrop of ongoing legal challenges involving the Digital Superhighway project.

Consumer rights groups and governance activists have previously moved to court seeking to nullify some of the contracts, arguing that companies allegedly associated with Mary Wambui should not have participated in projects connected to institutions operating within the broader communications ecosystem.

The petitioners have sought greater transparency regarding company ownership structures, tender evaluation processes and the criteria used to award the contracts.

Government Defends Procurement Process

Despite mounting criticism, government agencies have consistently defended the procurement process.

Officials from the ICT Authority, Communications Authority and the Office of the Solicitor General have maintained that the Digital Superhighway tenders were awarded competitively and in accordance with procurement regulations.

The agencies have further argued that Mary Wambui had exited direct ownership and management roles in the companies under scrutiny before the contracts were awarded.

Government officials have therefore rejected allegations of wrongdoing and insisted that all procedures were followed during the tendering process.

Mary Wambui Mungai
Mary Wambui Mungai

Why the Digital Superhighway Project Matters

The Digital Superhighway project is a cornerstone of Kenya’s digital economy strategy and is expected to consume billions of shillings in public investment over the coming years.

The programme aims to increase internet access in underserved areas, improve digital service delivery, support e-government initiatives and accelerate economic growth through enhanced connectivity.

Given the project’s scale and strategic importance, governance experts argue that transparency and public confidence are essential to its success.

They note that major public infrastructure projects must not only comply with procurement laws but also avoid circumstances that create perceptions of favoritism, insider advantage or undue influence.

Pressure Mounts for Greater Transparency

The Auditor-General’s observations are expected to intensify calls for greater transparency regarding Digital Superhighway contracts and the companies that benefited from them.

Oversight bodies, lawmakers and governance advocates are likely to push for additional disclosures on company ownership, procurement evaluations and contract awards to reassure taxpayers that public funds are being spent appropriately.

With billions of shillings at stake and the Digital Superhighway programme playing a central role in Kenya’s digital transformation agenda, the controversy surrounding Mary Wambui-linked contracts is unlikely to fade anytime soon.

As scrutiny grows, pressure is mounting on government agencies to provide full accountability and demonstrate that all Digital Superhighway contracts were awarded fairly, competitively, and in the best interests of Kenyan taxpayers.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedinTumblrWhatsappTelegramEmail
JKIA
Business

Ruto Hands Chinese Firm KSh375 Billion JKIA Mega Deal After Adani Exit

by Daily Trends
written by Daily Trends

The government has awarded China Communications Construction Company (CCCC) a KSh375.4 billion ($2.9 billion) contract for the expansion and modernisation of Jomo Kenyatta International Airport (JKIA), marking one of Kenya’s most ambitious infrastructure undertakings in recent years.

The deal, which falls under the newly established National Infrastructure Fund (NIF), signals a renewed reliance on Chinese state-backed contractors for large-scale national projects following the collapse of a previous concession arrangement involving India’s Adani Group.

Although the government has not yet made a formal public announcement, sources familiar with the matter confirmed the award to Bloomberg, noting that preparations for the project are already underway.

Return of Chinese infrastructure dominance

The JKIA expansion deal comes months after President William Ruto announced that construction works would begin in June 2026, following the government’s mobilisation of seed capital for the NIF.

That seed funding includes KSh20 billion drawn from the privatisation proceeds of the Kenya Pipeline Company (KPC), part of a broader financing strategy meant to support long-term infrastructure development.

Chinese firms have long played a central role in Kenya’s infrastructure landscape, delivering major projects such as the Nairobi Expressway, the Standard Gauge Railway, and sections of key highways including the Rironi–Mau Summit corridor.

The latest award places China Communications Construction Company at the centre of Kenya’s most significant aviation infrastructure overhaul in decades.

A 20-year master plan for JKIA

The expansion and upgrade of JKIA will be implemented under a 20-year master plan running through 2045, designed to guide phased development, capacity expansion, and financial sustainability.

The plan envisions a transformation of the 68-year-old airport into a modern regional aviation hub capable of handling significantly higher passenger volumes and improved operational efficiency.

Two-phase expansion strategy

According to earlier government briefings, the project will be implemented in two major phases.

Phase one will focus on upgrading existing infrastructure, including taxiways, terminal processing areas, landside access routes, and digital airport systems. These upgrades are expected to increase JKIA’s capacity to approximately 12 million passengers annually within 18 months.

Phase two will involve large-scale expansion works, including the construction of a new 4,500-metre parallel runway and a 230,000-square-metre passenger terminal designed to handle an additional 10 million passengers per year.

The new terminal is expected to feature a modern X-shaped architectural design aimed at improving passenger flow, reducing congestion, and enhancing service efficiency.

Financing questions linger

While the contract award marks a major milestone, questions remain over how the government will finance the project beyond the initial KSh20 billion seed allocation from KPC proceeds.

It was not immediately clear how the remaining KSh355 billion required for the full implementation of the project would be mobilised, with analysts suggesting a mix of public-private partnerships, concessional financing, and infrastructure bonds may be considered.

Strategic economic implications

JKIA remains Kenya’s busiest and most critical aviation hub, serving millions of passengers annually and acting as a key gateway for trade, tourism, and regional connectivity.

The expansion is expected to strengthen Nairobi’s position as a leading aviation hub in Africa, particularly as competition intensifies from regional airports in Addis Ababa, Kigali, and Johannesburg.

The decision to proceed with a Chinese contractor also underscores Kenya’s continued strategic engagement with Beijing in infrastructure development, even as global financing models shift and scrutiny over debt sustainability remains high.

A major infrastructure gamble

The project is widely seen as both a strategic opportunity and a financial test for the government’s infrastructure agenda.

If successfully implemented, the JKIA expansion could significantly reshape Kenya’s aviation capacity and economic outlook for decades. However, the scale of financing required and the complexity of execution place it among the most challenging public infrastructure projects undertaken in the country.

As the project moves from announcement to implementation, attention will now shift to procurement transparency, financing clarity, and delivery timelines.

For now, Kenya has once again turned to China for one of its biggest infrastructure bets yet—this time at the heart of its busiest airport.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedinTumblrWhatsappTelegramEmail
Havenfields Real Estate Ltd MD Paul Waihenya
Business

Land Buyers Accuse Paul Waihenya and Havenfields Real Estate of Selling Dreams, Delivering Dust

by Daily Trends
written by Daily Trends

Families Demand Refunds or Equivalent Compensation Over Controversial Kitengela Land Project

A growing group of land buyers is demanding answers from Havenfields Real Estate Ltd and its Managing Director, Paul Waihenya, over a controversial land project in Kimalat, Kitengela, that has left dozens of investors claiming they lost their savings after the plots they purchased allegedly became unavailable.

The dispute, which dates back several years, has reignited debate about due diligence, consumer protection, and accountability in Kenya’s booming real estate sector.

Affected buyers claim they invested hundreds of thousands of shillings in 50×100 plots marketed by Havenfields Real Estate Ltd, believing they were securing valuable property in the fast-growing Kitengela area.

According to the buyers, the company promised title deeds, future development, and secure ownership, making the project attractive to families, professionals, and small-scale investors seeking to build homes or secure long-term investments.

However, the investors allege that, years later, they discovered the land had become the subject of government acquisition proceedings and other ownership complications, leaving them unable to access the plots they had paid for.

Havenfields Real Estate Ltd offices. PHOTO/Havenfields Real Estate/Facebook
Havenfields Real Estate Ltd offices. PHOTO/Havenfields Real Estate/Facebook

Buyers Claim Warning Signs Were Ignored

Several affected investors now allege that concerns surrounding the land emerged long before many of the transactions were completed.

The buyers claim that despite emerging questions over the project’s future, sales continued, resulting in more investors purchasing plots that later became the center of disputes.

The allegations have fueled anger among affected families, many of whom say they invested life savings, retirement benefits, business proceeds, and loan facilities into the project.

Some claim they have spent years seeking answers from the company through meetings, correspondence, and negotiations.

Compensation Offer Sparks Fresh Outrage

One of the biggest sources of contention is an alternative compensation proposal reportedly presented to some affected buyers.

According to investors, they were offered alternative parcels of land in Malindi after the Kitengela project ran into difficulties.

However, the buyers argue that the proposed compensation does not match the value, location, or investment potential of the plots they originally purchased in Kitengela.

Some investors who reportedly visited the alternative sites claim the land is several kilometres from Malindi town and lacks key infrastructure, including roads, electricity, and water connections.

“We were taken to a place that felt like punishment, not compensation,” one buyer said.

The affected families argue that they should either receive equivalent plots within Nairobi and its surrounding areas or be refunded the money they paid, together with compensation for the years they have waited.

Growing Pressure on Havenfields and Paul Waihenya

The controversy has increasingly spilled onto social media, where some investors have accused Havenfields Real Estate Ltd and its leadership of failing to adequately resolve the dispute.

Paul Waihenya, who is widely known through property investment content shared on social media platforms, has built a public profile by encouraging Kenyans to invest in land and real estate.

His videos frequently discuss wealth creation through property ownership and often encourage investors to consider land as a superior long-term investment.

However, the ongoing dispute has placed renewed scrutiny on both the company and its management as affected buyers intensify their campaign for compensation.

Havenfields Real Estate Victims Demand Action

The investors say they are now organizing collectively to pursue what they describe as fair compensation and accountability.

They claim to possess agreements, payment records, receipts, and correspondence relating to their transactions with the company.

The buyers insist they are not seeking special treatment but simply want the company to honour its obligations.

Their demands remain straightforward:

  • Full refunds of monies paid, together with interest and compensation for losses suffered; or
  • Alternative plots of equal or greater value within Nairobi or its immediate environs.

Wider Questions for Kenya’s Property Sector

The dispute has once again highlighted the risks facing land buyers in Kenya, where ownership disputes, compulsory acquisitions, overlapping titles, and delayed transfers continue to affect thousands of investors.

Property experts have consistently advised buyers to conduct thorough due diligence before purchasing land, including verification of ownership records, title status, zoning restrictions, and any pending government projects that may affect the property.

As pressure mounts, affected buyers say they will continue pursuing all available avenues to seek compensation and resolution.

Meanwhile, attention remains firmly focused on Havenfields Real Estate Ltd and its Managing Director, Paul Waihenya, as investors await a lasting solution to a dispute that has left many claiming their dreams of land ownership turned into years of uncertainty and frustration.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedinTumblrWhatsappTelegramEmail
Bobmil Industries Limited
Business

Mattress Cartel Scandal: WhatsApp Leak Blow Open Massive Price-Fixing Allegations Against Bobmil, Superform, Vitafoam

by Daily Trends
written by Daily Trends

A major Competition Authority of Kenya (CAK) investigation has rocked the country’s foam mattress industry, with Bobmil Industries, Superform Limited, Foam Mattress Limited, Jumbo Foam Mattress Industries, and Vitafoam Products now facing explosive allegations of running a coordinated price-fixing cartel allegedly exposed through WhatsApp communications and a controversial joint court filing.

The case, which spans factories in Kisumu, Athi River, Nairobi, Machakos and Kiambu, has triggered dawn raids, forensic seizures, and a widening regulatory probe into what investigators believe could be one of the most coordinated anti-competitive networks in Kenya’s consumer goods sector.

WhatsApp leak and advance warning that triggered alarm

According to investigators, senior figures across the five companies allegedly used WhatsApp group chats and internal messaging systems to share sensitive intelligence about impending regulatory action by CAK.

Weeks before March 30, 2026, executives reportedly circulated warnings that Competition Authority officers were preparing simultaneous dawn raids across multiple factories nationwide, including operations in Nairobi, Kisumu, Machakos, Kiambu and Athi River, with possible expansion to Mombasa branches.

It is this alleged advance intelligence-sharing that regulators now believe formed part of a wider coordination system linking the companies under suspicion.

The court petition that allegedly exposed the network

In a dramatic turn, the five companies—through KAN Advocates LLP—filed a joint High Court petition on March 30, 2026, describing shared intelligence on CAK surveillance and naming factories believed to be targeted in the coordinated raids.

The petition cited alleged violations of privacy and the Fair Administrative Action Act, arguing that CAK’s planned enforcement actions were unlawful and intrusive.

However, the suit was withdrawn the following morning, just hours before CAK carried out simultaneous raids across four counties.

Regulators now argue that the petition itself inadvertently provided critical evidence of coordination, linking the firms in a single intelligence-sharing framework.

CAK raids and seizure of key evidence

Following the withdrawal, CAK officers executed coordinated dawn raids across multiple locations, seizing laptops, mobile phones, hard drives, USB devices, sales records, and internal management documents.

The seized materials are now undergoing forensic analysis, with investigators specifically targeting deleted messages, WhatsApp threads, pricing communications, and records that may indicate coordinated pricing decisions.

CAK officials have invoked Section 32 of the Competition Act, which allows unannounced raids where there is risk of evidence being destroyed or concealed.

Alleged cartel structure and consumer impact

The foam mattress industry in Kenya is dominated by a small number of manufacturers supplying essential household goods used by millions of families.

Investigators believe the companies may have coordinated pricing across budget and premium segments, suppressing competition in a market where consumers have limited alternatives.

At the lower end, mattresses retail at around KSh 4,000, while premium orthopaedic and memory foam models can exceed KSh 150,000. CAK suspects coordinated pricing may have inflated costs across this entire range.

CAK Director-General David Kemei has previously indicated that the probe seeks to determine whether collusive practices have affected affordability and market fairness for Kenyan consumers.

Precedent: steel cartel case and WhatsApp evidence

The investigation draws parallels with a previous CAK case involving nine steel companies fined a total of KSh 338.8 million after WhatsApp messages, emails, and internal records revealed coordinated pricing strategies.

That case, upheld by the Competition Tribunal in 2025, established that digital communications—including deleted WhatsApp messages—are admissible evidence in cartel investigations.

Investigators believe the mattress case may follow a similar evidentiary pattern.

Bobmil under renewed regulatory spotlight

Among the firms under scrutiny, Bobmil Industries faces additional historical regulatory attention, including past KEBS investigations over product quality complaints and a contested company dissolution notice issued in 2025 before being disputed by the company.

These developments now form part of a broader profile being reviewed by regulators assessing compliance and corporate conduct.

Superform and private equity scrutiny

Superform Limited, part of a regional consolidation backed by Catalyst Principal Partners and supported by development finance institutions, has drawn additional attention due to its institutional ownership structure.

Investigators and analysts are now watching closely to determine whether governance frameworks within the private equity-backed structure adequately prevented or detected potential anti-competitive conduct.

What happens next

The Competition Authority of Kenya is expected to complete forensic analysis of seized devices before issuing formal findings or charges.

If cartel behaviour is confirmed, the companies could face penalties of up to 10 percent of annual turnover per violation, alongside reputational damage, consumer redress claims, and long-term compliance monitoring.

The firms will also be given an opportunity to respond to allegations before any final determination is made.

A case that began in a group chat

What began as a regulatory investigation into pricing patterns has now evolved into a high-stakes legal and forensic battle, where WhatsApp messages, court filings, and seized devices are central to proving whether Kenya’s mattress industry operated as a coordinated cartel.

For millions of Kenyan households, the outcome could determine not just accountability—but whether years of mattress pricing were shaped by competition or collusion.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedinTumblrWhatsappTelegramEmail
Business

Rethinking Premium: Why price is no longer the ultimate marker of quality

by Daily Trends
written by Daily Trends

By Lilian Mbugua

Walk into any social gathering in Nairobi today and you’ll notice something interesting; people are drinking better and spending smarter.

For years, we’ve known that a premium experience comes at a higher price. The higher the cost, the better the quality; It’s a belief that has shaped how consumers approach not just spirits, but lifestyle choices in general. With time, that idea starts to feel outdated.

The assumption that quality must be expensive has created a quiet barrier, one that suggests enjoying something refined requires a bigger budget. Yet, in reality, great taste, great craftsmanship, and a good experience don’t always sit on the highest shelf. Often, they’re simply positioned differently.

What’s changing now is the mindset of the consumer. Today’s drinker is more intentional. They are asking intelligent questions: Is this worth it? Does it fit my lifestyle? Can I enjoy this more often, not just on special occasions? Value, not just status, is driving decisions. The shift is subtle yet powerful, moving from aspirational spending to practical enjoyment.

Elevating Every Moment

The ultimate mark of an exceptional gin often lies in its inherent versatility. Can it be enjoyed simply; taken neat or merely with tonic, or can it make a cocktail masterpiece? A truly outstanding gin gracefully adapts to any occasion, from a laid-back evening with cherished companions to a more grand, celebratory gathering. Its character should always complement, never overpower, the chosen mixer, thus paving the way for an impressive array of delightful cocktails

This remarkable adaptability is undeniably where Gilbey’s truly shines, empowering us to create meaningful memories and authentic connections. Whether you’re mixing up a refreshingly crisp Gin &Tonic on a chilled afternoon or during a vibrant party, Gilbey’s consistently serves as the perfect, dependable foundation. It actively encourages mixology experimentation and consistently offers a bright profile that harmonizes beautifully with diverse tastes and preferences.

And that matters, because the real magic of social drinking has never been about the bottle, it’s about the moments around it. The laughter that lingers a little longer, the stories that only ‘day ones’ understand and the comfort of being fully yourself, without filters.

The Ksh999 offer on Gilbey’s 750ml, saving you 550 bob, therefore is more than the price point. It is an entry point into premium experiences, democratized for a wider audience. It lowers the barrier without lowering the standard. Therefore, you don’t have to wait for a special occasion to enjoy something good. You can create that moment right where you are, with who you have.

This is the essence behind the Gilbey’s Real Moments campaign, to celebrate authentic connections and a powerful reminder to the consumers to share their unfiltered moments with their ‘day ones’.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedinTumblrWhatsappTelegramEmail
Business

PUBG Mobile & Infinix Ignite Kenya Varsity Showdown With $1,000 Prize Pool and 10 GT 30 Pro Smartphones

by Daily Trends
written by Daily Trends

University gamers across Kenya are invited to battle for glory in the biggest PUBG MOBILE varsity competition yet.

PUBG MOBILE and Infinix have officially announced the launch of the PUBG MOBILE Varsity Showdown (PMVS), a nationwide university esports tournament designed to unite student gamers from across Kenya in an exciting competitive gaming experience.

Powered by Infinix, the only smartphone brand in Kenya with a dedicated gaming smartphone lineup – the GT Series – specifically built for competitive mobile gamers and high-performance gameplay. Through this partnership, gamers will get the opportunity to experience the newly launched Infinix GT 30 Pro, a device engineered for smooth gaming performance, immersive visuals, fast response, and powerful cooling capabilities ideal for esports competition.

Beyond the tournament, the collaboration also positions Infinix at the center of Kenya’s growing gaming culture as the brand prepares to introduce the highly anticipated GT 50 Pro into the Kenyan market soon, further reinforcing its commitment to supporting and elevating the local gaming community.

The tournament campaign will run from mid-May through late June 2026, featuring multiple stages of online competition leading into the official offline Grand Finals.

TOURNAMENT FORMAT

The competition will follow a multi-stage structure featuring:

• Online Qualifiers
• Quarter Finals
• Semi Finals
• Offline Grand Finals (Date to be announced)

Each squad will consist of:

• 4 Players
• 1 Substitute

Official PUBG MOBILE tournament rules and scoring systems will be applied throughout the competition.

PRIZES

Participants will battle for:

• USD 1000 Prize Pool
• 10 Infinix GT 30 PRO smartphones
• Campus pride and national recognition

DRIVING YOUTH ESPORTS CULTURE

The campaign will also feature:

• Campus ambassador mobilization
• Community-driven gaming engagement
• Social media creator campaigns
• Weekly mini online tournaments
• User-generated content challenges

The objective is to continue growing Kenya’s esports ecosystem while creating opportunities for young gaming talent to showcase their skills, creativity, and competitive spirit.

CALL FOR REGISTRATION

All university students across Kenya are encouraged to form squads, register, and represent their campus in the PUBG MOBILE Varsity Showdown.

Registration is now officially open: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1diQYBhN0judKkUaI4T_Et87qULBpK0j0U8JPuIi0y9s/edit

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedinTumblrWhatsappTelegramEmail
Business

TikTok who? YouTube sorry. Kenyan-built platform just dropped—and 20 African ministers showed up to launch it

by Daily Trends
written by Daily Trends

While Gen Z creators are busy begging followers to “click the link in bio” for cents per thousand views, a quiet rebellion is brewing in Nairobi.

Meet UrbanTok — and no, it’s not another clone.a.

Launched last month at the Connected Africa Summit 2026, the platform had an unusual guest list: not just investors, but over 20 ICT ministers from across the continent, led by Kenya’s own Hon. William Kabogo (ICT Cabinet Secretary) and Hon. Lee Kinyanjui (Trade & Industry CS).

Even PS Eng. John Tanui called it a major milestone for Kenya’s digital sovereignty.

Why would ministers, not Silicon Valley VCs, rally behind a new social app?

Because UrbanTok isn’t fighting for your attention. It’s fighting for your wallet.

For years, African creators have been the engine that drives global platforms — but never the ones who get paid.

Think about it. A dancer in Lagos gets two million views on TikTok. A comedian in Nairobi goes viral every week. A filmmaker in Accra builds a loyal audience on YouTube. The engagement is massive. The passion is real.

But the payout? A fraction of what a creator in London or New York would earn for the same numbers. High withdrawal thresholds. Payment methods that don’t work with local banks. And algorithms that seem designed to keep African content from reaching truly global audiences — or sustainable ad revenue.

Africa has been the perfect consumer of digital entertainment. Scrolling, liking, sharing, laughing. But when it comes to earning from the value we create? The door has stayed firmly shut.

While global platforms pay African creators in “exposure” and $100 payouts that take three weeks to hit M-Pesa, this homegrown ecosystem is flipping the script:

• Local currency payouts (no PayPal horror stories)
• Paid livestreams, gifting, and even a built-in dropshipping store called UrbanDuka
• Monetization from day one — not after a million followers

In its first week? Over 10,000 daily active users. The CEO, Naftal Nyabuto (a 19-year tech vet in fintech, AI, and blockchain), put it bluntly: “We’re not a content-first platform with monetization tacked on. We’re a monetization engine that happens to stream video.”

And that is exactly why 20 African ministers didn’t just attend the launch — they endorsed it.

Because this isn’t just about one app. It’s about digital sovereignty. It’s about stopping the drain of African data, attention, and creativity into foreign servers that send back only scraps.

Kabogo, Kinyanjui, and the other ministers see what many have ignored: Africa’s creator economy is bleeding value. Every hour a young person spends creating content on a foreign platform is an hour that builds someone else’s shareholder value — not their own community wealth.

UrbanTok is the first serious attempt to change that math. To turn Africa from a consumer of digital platforms into a creator and owner of them.

So here’s the question Gen Z is already asking — and investors are quietly scrambling to answer: Could the first platform that actually pays African creators be… African?

Let’s talk numbers — because the math is staggering.

Over 18.4 million Kenyans are active on TikTok alone. That’s nearly one in three Kenyans. Across Nigeria, South Africa, Ghana, and the wider continent, the figures multiply into the hundreds of millions of active users. They scroll, like, share, and create.

They generate billions of views monthly — the kind of engagement that would make any Western market drool. And what do the platforms pay back? Almost nothing. In Nigeria, TikTok’s Creator Rewards Programme remains completely unavailable to most creators.

Kenyan users face payment thresholds so high they might as well be invisible. And when payouts do come, they bleed value through PayPal’s currency conversion fees, foreign transaction charges, and bank intermediary costs that can eat up to 20 percent of hard-earned money before it even touches M-Pesa.

Now flip the camera. What do the platforms earn?

Industry estimates suggest global short-video platforms generate upwards of $500 million annually from African markets through advertising, virtual gifting, and data harvesting — yet less than 5 % of that finds its way back to African creators. The rest? Repatriated to Silicon Valley bank accounts. Used to fund product development for European users.

Spent on lobbying Washington. The algorithm that decides whether a Nairobi creator eats or starves isn’t programmed in Nairobi.

It’s programmed in San Francisco, by engineers who have never struggled to withdraw their own money. “African creators are completely dependent on decisions made by foreign platforms with little regard for their economic realities,” the research notes. UrbanTok isn’t asking for a seat at that table. It’s building a new one — and inviting the whole continent to sit down.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedinTumblrWhatsappTelegramEmail
Load More Posts