A fierce legal battle over a prime six-acre estate in Karen bordering the Ngong Forest has escalated into one of Nairobi’s most controversial property disputes, with businesswoman and politician Agnes Kagure now at the centre of allegations involving forged documents, disputed ownership claims, and claims of coordinated land-grabbing tactics that have dragged on for more than a decade.
Court records and testimonies from multiple hearings paint a complex and contested picture of competing claims over the estate formerly owned by British national Roger Bryan Robson, who died on August 8, 2012, leaving behind a will that directed his properties to be sold and proceeds distributed to family members and conservation charities.
The Karen Estate at the Centre of the Storm
The disputed property, located along Ushirika Road in Karen and bordering the Ngong Forest, consists of approximately six acres of high-value land that has remained under litigation since Robson’s death.
Robson’s will, executed on March 24, 1997, named executors Guy Spencer Elms and Sean Battye and directed that his properties, including the Karen estate and Upper Hill apartments, be sold and proceeds distributed among his nephew, the Kenya Wildlife Service, the Kenya Forest Service, and an educational charity.
Battye later renounced his role, leaving Elms as the sole executor.
However, Kagure has consistently maintained that she legally purchased the Karen property in November 2011 for Sh100 million, a claim that has been repeatedly challenged in court by the estate and witnesses.
Allegations of Forged Documents and Missing Evidence
Central to the dispute are allegations that documents presented in support of Kagure’s ownership claim bear questionable authenticity.
Lawyer David Michuki, who previously represented Robson, told the court that signatures on Kagure’s conveyance documents did not resemble those of the deceased businessman, while also stating that the photograph on the conveyance paperwork was not of Robson.
Further testimony by Chief Inspector Susan Wanjiru indicated that signatures appearing on disputed documents showed inconsistencies, while defence forensic expert Jacob Oduor found no evidence of forgery on Robson’s genuine will.
Despite Kagure’s assertion that she paid Sh100 million for the property, courts have noted the absence of a verifiable payment trail, including bank transfers, receipts, or stamp duty records that would ordinarily accompany such a transaction.
Robson’s family members, including his brother Michael Fairfax Robson, have also testified that the deceased remained in full control of his property until his death and never entered into any sale agreement with Kagure.
Physical Occupation and Police Involvement Allegations
The dispute escalated beyond paperwork into physical confrontation at the property.
In court filings, estate executor Guy Spencer Elms stated that individuals linked to Kagure moved onto the property accompanied by police officers, evicted caretakers, and began construction of a perimeter wall.
Justice Mary Gitumbi subsequently issued an injunction barring any interference with the estate, but the court heard that the fencing continued regardless.
In later proceedings, Justice Lucy Njuguna made a striking observation that police officers had been actively aiding individuals alleged to be involved in fraudulent occupation of the land — a finding that intensified scrutiny of how law enforcement has interacted with the dispute.
Pattern of Disputed Property Cases
Beyond the Karen estate, Kagure has been linked to other long-running land disputes across Nairobi.
In Makadara, a widow alleged that a property owned by her late husband was transferred years after his death using contested documentation. In another Eastlands case, Justice Oguttu Mboya issued orders blocking Kagure from entering or claiming a disputed plot, ruling that the documents used to register the property were unlawful.
In yet another case involving a Nairobi Eastlands parcel, courts similarly found that ownership claims were based on questionable documentation.
Kagure has consistently denied wrongdoing in all cases, describing the allegations as politically motivated and part of targeted attacks linked to her political ambitions.
German Investor Fraud Allegations Add Pressure
Separate from land disputes, Kagure also faces allegations from German investor Uwe Heinz Odenthal, who claims he lost approximately €1 million (about Sh142 million) after investing in a petroleum venture linked to her.
Odenthal alleges he was promised high returns but received no dividends, and later reported the matter to the Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI). Kagure has dismissed the claims as politically driven.
Court Battles and Contradictory Rulings
The Karen estate case has produced a series of complex and sometimes contradictory legal developments.
In June 2025, Justice Hillary Chemitei ruled that Robson’s will was valid, properly executed, and showed no evidence of coercion or forgery, effectively upholding the legitimacy of the estate’s succession process.
However, parallel criminal proceedings initiated years earlier against executor Elms remain active, with courts yet to fully resolve the tension between civil findings and ongoing criminal charges.
At the centre of the current dispute is a legal argument advanced by Kagure’s legal team that the estate’s documents were not fully certified under succession law — a technical contention that could potentially affect the estate’s legal standing.
A Broader Debate on Land, Law, and Power
The case has now evolved into a broader debate over Kenya’s land administration system, succession processes, and enforcement of property rights.
Critics argue that Kenya’s legal system is vulnerable to exploitation through procedural gaps, prolonged litigation, and alleged interference from powerful interests.
Supporters of Kagure, however, insist she is the target of politically motivated legal attacks designed to derail her political career.
What Next for the Karen Estate?
The case is set to return to court in October 2026, where judges will weigh competing claims, forensic evidence, and procedural arguments that could determine the fate of the contested six-acre Karen property.
At stake is not only one of Nairobi’s most valuable estates, but also a legal precedent with implications for succession law, land ownership disputes, and enforcement of property rights in Kenya.
For now, the battle remains unresolved — a high-stakes legal and political confrontation that continues to divide opinion and raise difficult questions about land, power, and accountability in Kenya’s property system.
